Use PEE or PIE to develop body paragraphs in persuasive writing

Posted on September 24, 2025 | Leave a comment

PEE (Point, Evidence, Explain) is term to describe how paragraphs in persuasive writing should be developed.  It comes from research at the University of Arizona by Dr. Anne-Marie Hall who called it PIE (Point, Illustration, Explanation).  Paragraphs developed this way form good body paragraphs of persuasive writing.

Using this format, students write an opening topic sentence.  They follow it with facts to back it up.  Lastly, they connect the topic sentence and facts, analyzing how the facts support the topic sentence.

PEE is a method used in elementary grades to prepare students for persuasive writing.  Older students will use the same kind of logic in writing a thesis and in locating good research to cite to back a thesis.  PEE also teaches children the importance of facts such as names, numbers, and precise quotations if they want their opinions to be respected.

Here is a break-down of what PEE means, using and example that fourth graders could write:

P stands for Point, the point you are making in your answer to a question.  This point is made in a single sentence.  For example, the question could be, “Are you having a spelling test today?”  Your answer (point) could be, “Yes, I am having a spelling test today.

E stands for Evidence, the facts or examples that prove your point.  This evidence consists of facts such as numbers, dates, precise names, sources, and direct quotations.  For example, the evidence could be 1) It is Friday, and my teacher, Mrs. Spilling, always gives spelling tests on Friday.  2) Mrs. Spilling posted on September 23 on her school website (MrsBSpilling@ABCschool.edu) that my class is having a spelling test today.  3) My mother heard me my spelling words at 7:30 last night the way she always does the night before my spelling tests.

The second E stands for Explain.  That means to connect the point and the evidence.  For example, So because today is Friday, and my teacher, Mrs. Spilling posted on her website on Tuesday, September 23 that my class would have a spelling test today, and because my mother heard me my spelling words last night, I know I am having a spelling test today.

(A related idea which I have discussed previously in this blog is the sandwich method of introducing a quotation/citation into writing.)

The PEE or PIE format is not used for essay introductions or conclusions.  It shows a way to develop body paragraphs.

Leave a comment

Posted in PEE Point Evidence Explain, persuasive essay, PIE Point Illustration Explanation, teaching of writing, writing tips

Making peace with AI, one word at a time

Posted on September 13, 2025 | Leave a comment

A student was writing about a vacation experience using an iPad.  As he lengthened words into phrases and phrases into sentences, corrections automatically appeared on his google document.  For example,

  • My student wrote, “We stoped at” but before he could write the next word, google’s AI changed “stoped” to “stopped.” My student did not need to think why his spelling was wrong or how to fix it.  AI subtly did that for him, allowing the student to focus on the content of what he was writing.
  • My student wrote, “but we couldn’t eventually see.” Google AI changed the word order to “but eventually we couldn’t see.” No explanation was given to my student for this change.  He probably didn’t notice it because he was finishing the sentence.

When I work in Microsoft Word, that software makes similar changes.  Right now, as I type the word “type,” over that word appears the correct spelling.  The software has guessed what word I want and has suggested how to spell it.  I don’t need to know how to spell.

As a teacher [teacher, teaches, and teaching just appeared as I wrote the word “teacher”], I realize my students are not forced to spell correctly, or to understand proper word order, or to remember that the pronoun “I” needs to be capitalized.  As long as they compose on electronic equipment in its default mode, they need not learn the nitty gritty of writing.

What is a teacher to do?  Allow AI to do its magic?  Or interrupt a student’s flow to ask why AI made a particular change?

My decision is to allow AI to fix my students’ work.  My students will likely be writing on a computer or tablet or phone for years to come, and will avail themselves of these fixes outside of class.  So why not in class?  Kids used to take pencil to paper to write; now they take fingers to a keyboard.  I see this situation as similar to allowing math students to use calculators, or letting my phone remember phone numbers, or letting GPS direct me on vacation.

I have another student taking an AP course.  Soon she will need to take a test requiring her to write several paragraphs in longhand.  Without AI to correct her, her poor grammar skills will show.  Even if her thinking is flawless, if she cannot write a coherent sentence to show her thinking, her grade will disappoint.

Yet looking at my students’ futures, how often will they be required to write in longhand?  Is the teacher requiring longhand for a test being realistic?  Writing in longhand is becoming passé.

I suspect this blog will seem ridiculous to my grandchildren when they are my age.  Technology will have changed so much by then.  And the changed technology will change the expectations of teachers and students.  Better they learn to use technology than how to spell “stopped” correctly.  Their future depends on technology, not on correct spelling.

Leave a comment

Posted in AI or artificial intelligence, English Writing Instruction

Pantster or plotter? What kind of writer are you?

Posted on September 9, 2025 | Leave a comment

Writers come in two classes:  panster and plotter.  Which are you?

A pantster is a writer who doesn’t like to plan, someone who likes to write by the seat of their pants.  A pantster likes to discover his story as he writes it with plot twists he didn’t anticipate until he started writing.

A plotter likes to plot his stories before he writes them.  Some plotters write with minimal plots figured out before they start.  Other plotters anticipate every scene, setting, character, dialog and surprise in the outline.  They want to know what happens before they write.

Is one better than another?  It depends on the type of writing you are doing.

Essays require organization, a strong thesis statement, a development of that one idea, and a conclusion.  They require at least a minimal of plotting.

Biographies require some kind of plotting–usually chronological.

Whodunits require a murderer who is one of the characters.  Readers today don’t accept villains who come out of nowhere.  So plotting backwards is inevitable.  I can spot mysteries whose villain has not been well integrated into the story.  I feel cheated by these endings.  I have invested all this time into reading, and I expect the writer will respect me by providing a clever ending.  That takes careful planning.

Some fiction is comprised of self-contained short stories with one factor in common, such as a location or a character.  There might be an arc showing development, or there might not be.  Individual stories  might require some plotting, but the novel as a whole might not.  Or the story arc might be vague, such as a little brother annoys his big brother, and the big brother doesn’t like it.  These are more pantster than plotter.

Journey stories can be well written by a pantster.  You start the protagonist on his way, and then you add one difficult situation after another until he has faced enough perils.  Then you end the story with victory.  The order of the obstacles doesn’t matter.

The pantster does an awful lot of rewriting.  The plotter rewrites too, but not as much because so much writing was done in the planning stage of the story.  The plotter seems to finesse his writing while the pantster chucks page after page of irrelevant material.  Or maybe he saves it for another book.

Which we are—pantster or plotter—might depend on our personalities.  Detail-focused writers might prefer plotting to be sure all the details are included and in the right order.  Freedom-focused writers might prefer pantster’s lack of restrictions.

Perhaps the best-loved writers are a little bit of both, using sophisticated plotting paired with imaginative, surprising events.

Which kind of writer are you?

 

Leave a comment

Posted in English Writing Instruction, pantsters and plotters

The “write” way to stand out from the crowd on LinkedIn

Posted on August 12, 2025 | Leave a comment

On LinkedIn, standing out from the crowd is vital.  So how do you do that?

Don’t just “Like” a post.  Respond to a post in writing.  A written response, at a minimum, tells the writer of the post that you have read the post.  At a maximum, a written response will resonate with the writer of the post and develop a conversation, an introduction, a network, and who knows, work.

So what kinds of comments are good?  The kinds that engage you with the writer of the post will make you noticed.  If you want to be visible among the hundreds of thousands of social media users, you need to engage.  You need to take a step beyond the ☺ or the “Like” icons.  You need to say something meaningful to the writer of the post or to readers.  Noting that you “Like” a post does no good to anyone, including you.

Here are suggestions for good comments:

Quote part of the post and say what you think about it, what it brings to mind, or why you disagree.

Ask a question about the content.  Not all posts are clear.  Saying you’d value clearing up a confusing part shows you have engaged.

Supply a pertinent quotation from a well-known expert in the field.  Make a connection others might not.

Supply a witty quotation from a someone well known for their retorts.  Supply humor if you can.  Everyone loves humor.

Provide current news on the topic–the more up-to-date, the better.  And if the news is not generally available, tell where you found it so others can check for themselves.

Provide a counter point of view–respectfully.

Add a new angle, an insight, or an analogy.  Further the discussion with information which will extend the point made in the post.  Name a research paper, a book, an analysis that readers can find if they want deeper knowledge.

Involve yourself in the conversation if you want to be noticed.

 

 

Leave a comment

Posted in English Writing Instruction, LinkedIn, writing tips

Find the flaw

Posted on August 6, 2025 | Leave a comment

All of the following sentences have the same minor flaw.  Can you find it?

  • On the drive into the city from the airport, we encountered an accident.
  • The teacher scowled after she saw the robot.
  • The bird stopped singing as soon as it saw the cat.

Here’s the flaw.  In each sentence, the writer puts the later action first and the prior action second.

  • Which happens first, driving into the city or leaving the airport? Leaving the airport, right?  So the sentence is better written as “On the drive from the airport into the city. . .”
  • Which happens first, scowling or seeing the robot? Seeing the robot, right?  So the sentence is better written as “After she saw the robot, the teacher scowled.”
  • Which happens first, stopping singing or seeing the cat? Seeing the cat, right?  So the sentence is better written as “As soon as the bird saw the cat, the bird stopped singing.”

The flaw in all three sentences fits under the umbrella of “clarity.”  A sentence should be understood on a literal level during the first reading.  A reader should not need to reread a sentence to figure out in what order things are happening.

One way to gain clarity is by using chronological order.  We think in terms of what happens first, next, later and finally.  Our sentences should contain what happens first, first;  what happens next, next; and so on.  Reversing the order of telling can confuse readers.  [Reversing the order comes first; confusing readers comes second.]  Why take the chance?  Make your writing clear during the first read.

Leave a comment

Posted in clarity, English Writing Instruction, writing tips