Chart Method of note-taking

Note-taking is one of those skills that some teachers assume students know.  But many students have never been taught this skill essential for school success.  Below is one note-taking method.

The Chart Method of note-taking is recording information in chart or table form.  It is a good method to note data or facts.  Below is an example of a Chart Method of note-taking.

Ages of US Presidents

 

 

 

*President Grover Cleveland was inaugurated two times with a gap of four years between his two inaugurations.  He is counted twice in this category for an age of 47 at his first inauguration and an age of 55 at his second.
**Several past presidents are alive and are not included in this category.

To use this method of note-taking, the notetaker first determines what the main categories of the chart are.  These become the headings of the columns.  Next the notetaker draws the table.  In rows labeled to the left, the notetaker lists key points to be included under each column.

The chart method of note-taking has many advantages:

  • The chart is a clear visual representation of information.
  • The layout allows a quick comparison of the data.
  • Usually, no sentences need be written, streamlining the note-taking.
  • Anyone can quickly retrieve information from the chart.
  • Charts are adaptable to many subjects.
  • Charts aid in pattern recognition.
  • Charts are well organized.

The chart method of note-taking has disadvantages:

  • Information which is not readily broken down into categories is not well suited for chart note-taking.
  • At the start of a lecture, a student might not realize a chart is useful for the material to be covered, so the student might not draw one.
  • Some categories might have no relevant data, and other categories might have numerous data.

Teachers can help students learn to take notes in chart form by modeling charts or by alerting students that a chart might be a good way to write the information about to be presented.

How important are apostrophes?

On many SAT exams, students face choosing either “its,” “it’s,” “its’,” “their,” they’re,” or “there” as an answer to a prompt.  For example, what is the correct answer for the following clause?

“Toward the end of the 1400s, as the Renaissance was reaching its height. . .”

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. it’s
  3. its’
  4. their

Colleges must think knowing how to spell “its” and “their” correctly is an important skill for college-bound students to use correctly.  Otherwise, why would questions about their spelling be on the exams?  But is knowing if an apostrophe is needed and how to use it really that important?

In northern England, the North Yorkshire Council voted recently to remove apostrophes from street names.  So, the former “St. Mary’s Walk” has been changed to “St. Marys Walk.”  Another change is from “King’s Walk” to “Kings Walk.”

The meaning of each street name is slightly different without the apostrophe.  But would you be confused if you were looking for an address?  When we say, “St. Mary’s Walk,” we don’t mention the apostrophe, yet we are understood.

English teachers spend hours of classroom time instilling in children the importance of using apostrophes correctly.  In the phrase, “the sisters bike,” do you know where the apostrophe goes?  Or even if an apostrophe is needed?  (Yes, an apostrophe is needed.  If it is one sister, the answer is between the “r” and “s.”  If it is two or more sisters, the answer is after the “s.”)

In contractions, the apostrophe takes the place of missing letters.  But don’t you understand “I dont know” as well as “I don’t know”?

What is spurring the dropping of apostrophes?  Computers.  Data bases.  Text messages.  Multitasking.  Frantic lives.  In our increasingly digital world, apostrophes are deemed unimportant.  On my phone, I need to shift to a different screen if I want to use an apostrophe and then shift back.  I still do that, but it takes time.  I notice my children don’t bother.  If we understand speech without apostrophes, why complicate things by using them in writing?

Grammar teachers may wonder if they have wasted their lives focusing on the correct use of apostrophes, quotation marks, and commas.  Cursive writing teachers may wonder the same.  For past generations, apostrophes were signs of a well educated person.  Today they still are, but that is changing.

By the way, the correct response to the question at the beginning of the blog is NO CHANGE.

Cornell Method of note-taking

The Cornell Method of note-taking

Note-taking is one of those skills that some teachers assume students know.  But many students have never been taught this skill essential for school success.

The Cornell Method of note-taking consists of sectioning off a piece of notebook paper (or a computer screen) to be used for various purposes.  A visual example and explanation are below.

The Cornell Method has advantages as a note-taking pattern:

  • Because the notes are paraphrased versions of the original, the note-taker needs to understand the original lecture or text as he or she takes notes; the note-taker is not merely a transcriber but an analyzer.
  • If the note-taker rereads the notes a few minutes after taking them, his or her chances to memorize the information increase since it is stated two or three times in the notes.
  • White space leaves room to fill in or clarify original notes.
  • If tests come weeks after the note-taking, the note-taker has sufficient notes to study from.
  • The unvarying structure of the method appeals to organized people.

 

The Cornell Method also has disadvantages:

  • Creating the blocks and using them properly is an advanced skill inappropriate for young students and even for some high school students.
  • Sticking to the format is challenging for students in a hurry, for perfectionists, and for creative types who want less imposed structure in their learning.
  • Many students will not reread their notes immediately after writing them, a key factor in the success of this method.

 

How to improve high school student writing

A study on ways to improve student writing is among the top ten education studies of 2023, according to Edutopia a free source focusing on what works in education.  Edutopia is part of  the George Lucas Educational Foundation.

The study found that providing students with rubrics and/or mentor texts can lead to higher writing grades.  It also lowers the amount of time teachers need to grade student writing.

In the study, high school students’ essays were graded on “clarity, sophistication and thoroughness.”  Then students were divided into small groups and told to use rubrics or mentor texts to revise their essays for a final grade.  Using these guides helped students improve their writing without more teacher involvement.

Rubrics and mentor texts increase the efficiency of teacher time, can be used over and over again, and “enhance self-feedback,” leading students to become more independent writers, according to Edutopia.

How to start a narrative

How to start a good story today is much like how to start a good essay, though it’s different too.  Many good stories today begin without any background information.  They begin in the middle of the action and weave in whatever background information is necessary later.  For example,

“Duck, you fool.  They’ll see us.”  This beginning starts in the middle of action.  Better yet, it starts with dialog.  Do you want to know who the speaker and his companion are?  Do you want to know why they are hiding?  Do you want to know who is hunting them?  Will you continue reading?

The three-year-old waited under the dirty laundry in the closet just as Mom and he had practiced.  The noise had stopped, but he didn’t trust the silence either.  “Wait for me,” Mom had said.  So he waited.  Is this a game of hide and seek?  Or has something sinister happened to Mom?  Why did Mom have the child practice hiding?  Why did she tell him to wait for her?  Will you keep reading?

Compare those beginnings with this kind.

It was early morning when she boarded the school bus.  She took her assigned seat and looked around.  Yes, it was Monday, all right.  Everyone was sleeping or trying to.  This beginning lacks the energy of the previous two beginnings.  Do you want to know why she boarded the school bus?  Probably not because you already know.  She’s going to school.   Do you want to know why everyone is sleeping?  Probably not because it’s Monday and that’s the way it is on Mondays.  Will you keep reading?

Mrs. Miller put on her hat and spring coat and waited for the taxi.  It came on time.  She nodded to the driver.  “Twelve Maiden Lane.” She sat back, alone in the passenger section, and thought what she always thought, that this is the way Queen Elizabeth was pampered wherever she went.  Do we know why Mrs. Miller is taking a taxi?  Do we care?  How about her thought, comparing herself to Queen Elizabeth?  That’s a little more interesting.  Why does she think that?  Will you keep reading?

Should you start a narrative with a question?  Lots of students do, but such a beginning rarely draws in readers, especially if the reader knows the answer.  But sometimes it can work.

Oh, please, doctor, please tell me what it is?  Is it pneumonia?  Meningitis?  Is my baby going to be okay?  Why are you just standing there, doctor?  Please tell me.  This opening has several questions, each one more emotionally charged than the previous one.  It works because the thoughts are a form of action.  Why is the child sick?  Why is the parent so frantic?  Why is the doctor mute?  We don’t know what happened before.  We arrive in the crisis moment.  Will you keep reading?

In the past, writers began stories with exposition, that is, with background information.  Today that approach is out of style.  We want to jump right into the action.

If you tend to start narratives by giving background information, try this to start with action.  Move along until you find the inciting moment—the moment when the action begins.  Delete everything that comes before the inciting moment.  If it is necessary information, weave it in through dialog or thoughts—but not flashbacks.  Flashbacks interrupt the forward flow of your story.  Your narratives will be more dramatic and better read.