Monthly Archives: February 2015

Common Core Writing Standards in for fifth graders in Washington State

What do the Common Core Standards in writing require of typical students? What skills do students need to master using these new guidelines?

To give you an idea, I chose a state—Washington—at the opposite end of the country from where I live—Georgia—to see what its Department of Education expects. I chose to look only at the writing standards which apply to fifth graders.

Here is what I found.

Washington decided on four “Essential Academic Learning Requirements for Writing (2005).” (I have color-coded the four essential requirements so that you can follow them more easily.) They are

  • EALR 1: The student understands and uses a writing process.
  • EALR 2: The student writes in a variety of forms for different audiences and purposes.
  • EALR 3: The student writes clearly and effectively.
  • EALR 4: The student analyzes and evaluates the effectiveness of written work.

From these for essential requirements educators and parents in Washington derived much more detailed learning expectations. They are listed below. Although these learning expectations are unique to Washington, they resemble what is happening in other states which have adopted the Common Core Standards.

Component 1.1: Prewrites to generate ideas and plan writing.

1.1.1 Applies more than one strategy for generating ideas and planning writing.

  • Generates ideas prior to organizing them and adjusts prewriting strategies accordingly (e.g., brainstorms a list, selects relevant ideas/details to include in piece of writing, uses a story board).
  • Gathers information from a range of sources, formulates questions, and uses an organizer (e.g., electronic graphic organizer, chart) to analyze and/or synthesize to plan writing.

1.2.1 Produces multiple drafts.

  • Refers to a prewriting plan.
  • Drafts by hand and/or electronically.
  • Rereads text and continues drafting over time.
  • Rereads text, puts it away, and returns to it later.

1.3.1 Revises text, including changing words, sentences, paragraphs, and ideas.

  • Rereads work several times and has a different focus for each reading (e.g., first reading — adding details for elaboration; second reading — deleting sentences or phrases to achieve paragraph unity; third reading — reorganizing ideas for meaning).
  • Records feedback using writing group procedure (e.g., partner underlines telling sentences, such as “I had fun,” and writer changes to show detail, “I squealed as the roller coaster sped around a corner.”).
  • Makes decisions about writing based on feedback (e.g., revision before final draft).
  • Uses multiple resources to identify needed changes (e.g., writing guide, peer, adult, computer, thesaurus).

1.4.1 Applies understanding of editing appropriate for grade level (see 3.3).

  • Identifies and corrects errors in grade level conventions.
  • Uses multiple resources regularly (e.g., dictionary, peer, adult, available technology, writing guide).
  • Proofreads final draft for errors.

1.5.1 Publishes in more than one format for specific audiences and purposes.

  • Publishes using a variety of publishing options (e.g., book, poster).
  • Publishes multipage pieces and attends to format, graphics, illustrations, and other text features (e.g., captioned photos, maps).
  • Publishes for a wide range of purposes, in different forms and formats.
  • Uses a variety of available technology as part of publication (e.g., slide show, overhead projector, publication software).

1.6.1 Applies understanding of the recursive nature of writing process.

  • Revises at any stage of process.
  • Edits as needed at any stage.

1.6.2 Uses collaborative skills to adapt writing process.

  • Contributes to different parts of writing process when working on a class poetry book (e.g., individuals draft poem; group plans format together; individuals submit word processed poems; team edits; class publishes).

1.6.3 Uses knowledge of time constraints to adjust writing process.

  • Works on one draft over several days or weeks adjusting work to fit the time frame.
  • Allots amount of time for each stage of writing process for on-demand writing.
  • Adjusts the number of drafts for on-demand tasks.

Component 2.1: Adapts writing for a variety of audiences.

2.1.1 Applies understanding of multiple and varied audiences to write effectively.

  • Identifies an intended audience.
  • Identifies and includes information a diverse audience needs to know (e.g., explains prior events, makes no assumptions about audience’s prior knowledge, such as defining an ollie in skateboarding).
  • Anticipates readers’ questions and writes accordingly.

2.2.1 Demonstrates understanding of different purposes for writing.

  • Writes to analyze informational text or data (e.g., explains the steps of a scientific investigation).
  • Writes to learn (e.g., math learning logs, reflections, double-entry logs, steps/strategies used to solve math problems), to tell a story, to explain, and to persuade.
  • Writes for more than one purpose using the same form (e.g., a letter used to explain, to request, or to persuade).
  • Includes more than one mode within a piece to address purpose (e.g., descriptive details or narrative anecdote within an explanation.

2.3.1 Uses a variety of forms/genres.

  • Includes more than one form/genre in a single piece (e.g., a report about salmon that includes a poem, fact box, and story).
  • Maintains a log or portfolio to track variety of forms/genres used.
  • Produces a variety of new forms/genres. Examples:
    ~ interviews
    ~ autobiographies
    ~ business letters
    ~ expository essays
    ~ persuasive advertisements
    ~ field observation notes
    ~ book reviews
    ~ rhyming couplets
    ~ raps

2.4.1 Produces documents used in a career setting.

  • Collaborates with peers on writing projects (e.g., social studies reports, science lab reports).
  • Writes in forms associated with specific tasks or careers (e.g., fund-raising receipts, student council applications, data collection forms).

Component 3.1: Develops ideas and organizes writing.

3.1.1 Analyzes ideas, selects a narrow topic, and elaborates using specific details and/or examples.

  • Narrows topic with controlling idea (e.g., from general topic, such as baseball, to specific topic, such as “The Mariners are my favorite baseball team.”).
  • Selects details relevant to the topic to extend ideas and develop elaboration (e.g., specific words and phrases, reasons, anecdotes, facts, descriptions, examples).
  • Uses personal experiences, observations, and research to support opinions and ideas (e.g., data relevant to the topic to support conclusions in math, science, or social studies; appropriate anecdotes to explain or persuade).
  • Varies leads and endings in narratives.
  • Sequences ideas and uses transitional words and phrases to link events, reasons, facts, and opinions within and between paragraphs (e.g., order of importance — least, most).
  • Organizes clearly:
    ~ comparisons (e.g., point-by-point)
    ~ explanations (e.g., save most important point for last)
    ~ persuasion (e.g., if-then)
    ~ narratives (e.g., problem-solution-outcome).

3.1.2 Uses an effective organizational structure.

  • Writes in a logically organized progression of unified paragraphs.
  • Develops an interesting introduction in expository writing (e.g., leads with the five W’s, an interesting fact).
  • Develops an effective ending that goes beyond a repetition of the introduction (e.g., summary, prediction).
  • Varies leads and endings in narratives.
  • Sequences ideas and uses transitional words and phrases to link events, reasons, facts, and opinions within and between paragraphs (e.g., order of importance — least, most).
  • Organizes clearly:
    ~ comparisons (e.g., point-by-point)
    ~ explanations (e.g., save most important point for last)
    ~ persuasion (e.g., if-then)
    ~ narratives (e.g., problem-solution-outcome.

3.2.1 Applies understanding that different audiences and purposes affect writer’s voice.

  • Writes with a clearly defined voice appropriate to audience (e.g., informal versus formal voice).
  • Writes in appropriate and consistent voice in narrative, informational, and persuasive writing (e.g., a “how to” paper vs. a persuasive piece).

3.2.2 Uses language appropriate for a specific audience and purpose.

  • Uses precise language (e.g., powerful verbs, specific descriptors).
  • Uses formal, informal, and specialized language (e.g., photosynthesis, ratio, expedition) appropriate for audience and purpose.
  • Uses literary and sound devices (e.g., similes, personification, rhythm). • Selects words for effect.

3.2.3 Uses a variety of sentences.

  • Writes a variety of sentence lengths.
  • Writes a variety of sentence beginnings (e.g., starts with a participial phrase: “Laughing loudly, they walked down the hall.”).
  • Writes a variety of sentence structures (e.g., “Tran, busy with his homework, didn’t hear the telephone at first. Although he wanted to keep working, Tran took the call. He kept it short.”).
  • Writes with a rhythm pattern.

3.3.1 Uses legible handwriting.

  • • Maintains consistency in printing or cursive handwriting (e.g., size, spacing, formation, uppercase and lowercase).

3.2.2 Spells words appropriate for the grade level accurately.

  • Uses spelling rules and patterns from previous grades.
  • Spells high-frequency words correctly.
  • Uses multiple strategies to spell. Examples:
    ~ Visual patterns (e.g., -ion endings)
    ~ Sound patterns (e.g., easily confused endings -able / -ible, -ant /-ent)
    ~ Affixes (e.g., pre-, in-, un-, -ed, -ing, -graph)
    ~ Rules (e.g., “i” before “e” rule).
  • Self-corrects spelling errors.
  • Develops a personal spelling list.
  • Uses resources to find correct spelling for words identified as misspelled.

3.3.3 Applies capitalization rules.

  • Uses capitalization rules from previous grades.
  • Capitalizes brand names (e.g., Nike).
  • Capitalizes geographic regions (e.g., the West).
  • Uses resources.

3.3.4 Applies punctuation rules.

  • Uses punctuation rules from previous grades.
  • Uses periods in abbreviations (e.g., pg., ft.).
  • Uses commas to set off interjections (e.g., Okay, if you say so.) or
    explanatory phrases (e.g., They stood together, away from the pile of stones in the corner, and their voices were quiet.).
  • Uses comma after date or address within text (e.g., June 1, 1993, was an important day in my life.).
  • Uses quotation marks in dialogue correctly (e.g., “How’s it going?” the boy asked.).
  • Uses hyphen in numbers (e.g., twenty-three).
  • Uses hyphen to join numbers (e.g., pages 1-3, The Mariners won, 17-6.).
  • Uses ellipsis ( . . . ) correctly:
    ~ to show omitted words
    ~ to show a pause.
  • Uses semicolon correctly between two independent clauses.
  • Uses resources to check punctuation.

3.3.5. Applies usage rules.

  • Applies usage rules from previous grades.
  • Uses subject vs. object pronouns correctly (e.g., I vs. me).
  • Uses resources to check usage.

3.3.6 Uses complete sentences in writing.

  • • May use fragments in dialogue as appropriate.

3.3.7 Applies paragraph conventions.

  • Uses paragraph conventions (e.g., designated by indentation or block format, skipping lines between paragraphs).
  • Uses new paragraphs to change speakers in dialogue.

3.3.8 Applies conventional forms for citations.

  • Cites sources in research using a bibliographic format.

Component 4.1: Analyzes and evaluates others’ and own writing.

4.1.1 Analyzes and evaluates writing using established criteria.

  • Identifies professional authors’ styles and techniques (e.g., leads,
    conclusions, word choice, purpose, character, and plot development).
  • Critiques peers’ writing and supports the opinion using established criteria (e.g., content, organization, style, conventions).
  • Explains accuracy of content and vocabulary for specific curricular areas (e.g., in science — looking for conclusions drawn from data).

4. 1.2  Analyzes and evaluates own writing using established criteria.

  • Explains strengths and weaknesses of own writing using criteria (e.g., WASL rubric and anchor papers, checklists, 6-trait scoring guides).
  • Uses criteria to choose and defend choices for a writing portfolio.
  • Provides evidence that goals have been met (e.g., “My sentence fluency has
    improved because I now vary the beginnings of my sentences.”

4.2.1 Evaluates and adjusts writing goals using criteria.

  • Writes reflection about growth in writing and creates an improvement plan (e.g., “My introductions are getting better, but I need to learn about different kinds of conclusions.”).
  • Evaluates own use of writing process and sets goals (e.g., “After I brain-storm, I need to organize my ideas so my writing flows in a logical order.”).
  • Maintains a written log of goals.

Realistic goals? Remember this is one part–writing–of one course–English Language Arts–for fifth graders.  We’ll know more in June when the first class of Washington’s fifth graders completes this curriculum.

Fifth Grade Writing Standards as specified by the Common Core Standards

The Common Core Initiatives have specified what children should learn at each grade in each subject. These specifications are broad enough to be even more narrowly defined by state education departments (such as in Washington), but they are also narrow enough to serve as the state guidelines (such as in Kansas and Missouri).

Here are the Standards for fifth grade writing. (For more information on other grades or other subjects, go to http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.

Text Types and Purposes

  • W.5.1. Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons and information.
    • Introduce a topic or text clearly, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure in which ideas are logically grouped to support the writer’s purpose.
    • Provide logically ordered reasons that are supported by facts and details.
    • Link opinion and reasons using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., consequently, specifically).
    • Provide a concluding statement or section related to the opinion presented.
  • W.5.2. Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas and information clearly.
    •  Introduce a topic clearly, provide a general observation and focus, and group related information logically; include formatting (e.g., headings), illustrations, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
    • Develop the topic with facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples related to the topic.
    • Link ideas within and across categories of information using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., in contrast, especially).
    • Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic.
    • Provide a concluding statement or section related to the information or explanation presented.

W.5.3. Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, descriptive details, and clear event sequences.

    • Orient the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally.
    • Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, description, and pacing, to develop experiences and events or show the responses of characters to situations.
    • Use a variety of transitional words, phrases, and clauses to manage the sequence of events.
    • Use concrete words and phrases and sensory details to convey experiences and events precisely.
    • Provide a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events.

Production and Distribution of Writing

  • W.5.4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development and organization are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1–3 above.)
  • W.5.5. With guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.
  • W.5.6. With some guidance and support from adults, use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing as well as to interact and collaborate with others; demonstrate sufficient command of keyboarding skills to type a minimum of two pages in a single sitting.

Research to Build and Present Knowledge

  • W.5.7. Conduct short research projects that use several sources to build knowledge through investigation of different aspects of a topic.
  • W.5.8. Recall relevant information from experiences or gather relevant information from print and digital sources; summarize or paraphrase information in notes and finished work, and provide a list of sources.
  • W.5.9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
    • Apply grade 5 Reading standards to literature (e.g., “Compare and contrast two or more characters, settings, or events in a story or a drama, drawing on specific details in the text [e.g., how characters interact]”).
    • Apply grade 5 Reading standards to informational texts (e.g., “Explain how an author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points in a text, identifying which reasons and evidence support which point[s]”).

Range of Writing

  • W.5.10. Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.

In our next blog, we will look at how one state has adapted these standards for its fifth graders.

Common Core Standards are influencing how our children learn to read and write

In 2009 the state governors and commissioners of education in the US began creating what has become known as the Common Core Standards—goals to better the education of our public school students as they go through school, year by year, and in the basic courses of high school. The best practices in use around the US and the world were culled to create these standards using teacher, parent and expert advice. Forty-three states have adopted these standards and have begun the process of implementing them within their borders.

Controversy abounds, especially criticism that the standards demand too much of students. Two states backed out of the standards after adopting them.

The Common Core initiatives are striving to “level the playing field” among states, giving students in poorly performing states the same goals and criteria for measurement of success as students in better performing states.

States ranked by the quality of the education they offer studentsEach adopting state’s department of education figured out its own way to use these standards. In Georgia, where I live, end-of-year tests known as the Georgia Milestones were developed for grades three to eight, and end-of course tests were developed for certain high school math, English, science and social studies courses. These tests must account for 20 percent of a student’s final grade.

In the Georgia English Language Arts courses, 53 percent of the test grade is based on reading and vocabulary, and 47 percent is based on writing and other language arts criteria. The tests consist of

• multiple choice questions;

• open-ended questions (where the student must supply an answer not suggested in the test question);

• a narrative which the student must read, followed by a prompt which the student must answer by writing several sentences, using information from the narrative; and

• two narratives on a single subject which the student must read, followed by a prompt to which the student must answer with an essay-like response.

The Georgia English Language Arts test questions test four levels of knowledge:

• recall of information—knowing the facts;

• basic reasoning—describing and explaining;

• complex reasoning—justifying how and why by applying evidence from experience or from reading passages; and

• extended reasoning—connecting and relating ideas and providing evidence.

Although Georgia’s English Language Milestone tests vary from tests used in other states, all the tests demand the following from students:

• close reading of a text, meaning going beneath the surface of a reading passage or book to look for deeper meaning;

• finding and examining textual evidence, meaning answering questions based on what the text says, not on what a student thinks is true;

• supplying textual proof (page number, paragraph number, source);

• answering specific, thought-provoking questions which are dependent on the text; and

• using academic vocabulary.

Publishing student essays is essential

Most writing that a student does is seen by two people only—himself and his teacher. Sometimes the writing goes home and parents see it. But rarely do fellow students or friends see student writing. Rarely is there a real world audience.

Professional writers write for an audience. It may be tightly focused—a blog for race car enthusiasts—or it might be more widespread—Reader’s Digest readers. For students to do their best—for them to want to produce the best writing possible—publishing is essential.

EPSON MFP imageWhat is considered publishing for a student?

  • Hanging a finished essay on the refrigerator at home.
  • Photocopying the finished essay and mailing it to Grandma.
  • Scanning the finished essay into the computer and emailing it to aunts and uncles or former teachers.
  • Using the finished essay as Mom’s screen saver.
  • Putting a finished copy in a three-ring binder in a classroom or tutoring center for other students and parents to read.
  • Putting the finished essay online in a student blog or teacher’s blog of student writing.
  • Putting it online in a “great essays” section of a teacher’s classroom work.
  • Entering it in writing in contests.

Publishing matters. Professional writers don’t write for a grade. They write to be read. Too few students have this opportunity. But when they do, it motivates them to write better. At a tutoring center where I teach writing, students crowd around the binder bursting with finished student work. They mention what they have read to each other, or sometimes they try their own hand at the same kind of writing as their friend has written. I point this out to the students whose work has inspired other students, and they grin ear to ear.

Parents, too, read the writing of students. They look for students in the same grade as their child to see what other children of that age are writing. They read with pride their child’s work among other children’s work. They also read for the sheer pleasure of reading good writing.

Printed essays make students feel like professional writers

Rarely do students see their own writing printed unless they type it up themselves. That is why I type and print final drafts for them. They compare their handwritten drafts to the printed drafts in wonder.

This is the moment when they realize they are writers.

Smile, page 1, written draft 001

Above is a prewriting organizer in the form of a time line which a sixth grader used to write about events in a book she read. What follows are the two-page revised first draft and finally, the typed draft.

 

Smile, page 2 001

Handwritten revised draft of student essay

Handwritten revised draft of a student’s essay

Typed version of student's essay

Typed version of a student’s essay

When I type student essays on my computer, I print two final versions. One is for the student to take home, attached to the earlier, revised drafts, the list of verbs, the math showing the number of words per sentence and the range, and the mind web or other prewriting organizer. This package of papers shows a paper trail from the development of ideas through revision and the final draft. Parents can look over the changes the student has made to his essay and discover what the student already knows—that writing is a step-by-step process.

The other printed version I use for publishing. More about that in the next blog.